Surprisingly, it found that these extra trees could be grown in croplands and urban areas, highlighting the major role agro-forestry could play in tackling climate change. Some experts who were not involved with the study, however, expressed scepticism about some of its findings. "Humans have enhanced forest cover on a large scale only by shrinking their population size (Russia), increasing the productivity of industrial agriculture (the West) or by direct order of an autocratic government (China).

The team said their study evaluated the UN claim for the first time, showing where the trees could be restored and how much carbon they could capture.Washington: Good news: we can help halt climate change through a massive campaign of reforestation, according to a new study published Thursday. The most recent report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change proposed that limiting climate change to 2."Yes, heroic reforestation can help, but it is time to stop suggesting there is a nature-based solution to ongoing fossil fuel use."Planting trees to soak up two-thirds of the entire anthropogenic carbon burden to date sounds too good to be true.2 billion acres (900 million hectares) of trees that would sequester 205 billion tonnes of carbon.Such an effort could capture two-thirds of manmade carbon emissions and reduce overall levels in the atmosphere to their lowest in almost a century, according to the research that was carried out by ETH Zurich and published in Science."None of these activities looks remotely feasible or sustainable on a global scale.5 degrees Celsius) will require up to an extra 2."Restoration of trees may be among the most effective strategies, but it is very far indeed from the best climate change solution available, and a long way behind reducing fossil fuel emissions to net zero," said Myles Allen, a geosystem science professor at Oxford.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1. The paper found that the Earth can support 2.47 billion acres of forest by 2050.The study is the first to attempt to quantify how many trees the Earth can ., where to plant them and how much carbon they could store. Bad news: it would require covering an area the size of the United States in new trees, and even then some scientists are sceptical about the papers conclusions. "We all knew restoring forests could play a part in tackling climate change, but we had no scientific understanding of what impact this could China Polyester Oxford fabric Factory make," said co-author Thomas Crowther. Martin Lukac, a professor of eغير مجاز مي باشدystem science at the University of Reading, added that one of the papers weaknesses was its reliance on overly optimistic modelling. Probably because it is," he said. There isnt. The scenario, they added, is "undoubtedly achievable under the current climate."

The researchers studied around 80,000 high-resolution satellite photographs of protected forest areas, from the arctic tundra to equatorial rainforest, to establish a "natural level" of tree cover for each eغير مجاز مي باشدystem."Our study shows clearly that forest restoration is the best climate change solution available today."."But they warned that the need for action is urgent since a warming climate was already reducing the amount of land that can support new forests. Sorry," he added.They then used machine learning to identify 10 soil and climate variables that determine tree cover in each eغير مجاز مي باشدystem and created a predictive model to map potential tree cover worldwide under current environmental conditions

The 2019 Budget states that there will be only a marginal slippage of the deficit from the anticipated 3.Article 112 of the Constitution requires the government to present an annual financial statement but it does not stipulate that a government near the expiry of its term should do so only as in interim exercise, devoid of any policy or other major decisions.The Budget has three bonanzas for certain segments of the population: A Rs 6,000 direct income transfer to each of 12 crore small and marginal farm families annually (likely غير مجاز مي باشدt: Rs 72,000 crore a year), a full rebate of income tax to all those with taxable income of Rs 5 lakh a year, and a contributory pension scheme for workers in the unorganised sector.

Even if subsidies such as those for food and fertiliser and schemes such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee were to be subsumed under UBI, my own calculations show the commitment of resources to be well over 2 per cent of the GDP. Greater giveaways add to the expenditure that the government can undertake only with additional deficit, which in turn is a cause of alarm as it triggers inflation, hurting everyone. We will know in three months whether this ploy has succeeded. That period has long gone, happily for most people, but the Budget continues to arouse ever greater interest.This transfer can be truly considered a top-up, and not any variant of the much-discussed universal basic income (UBI). Democratic propriety, however, should weigh in favour of just such an exercise, which would leave the incoming government not burdened with the fait accompli of its predecessor. Well over 60 per cent of the population is expected to benefit from these give-aways estimated to غير مجاز مي باشدt around Rs 95,000 crore.But even so, realistic considerations should make us welcome it.The budgetary deficit is now rightly considered to be the most important parameter, which in turn is based on assumptions about revenues anticipated and expenditures planned.Indians have for long taken far deeper interest in the annual Budget of the Government of India and parsed it to a far greater extent than any other people in the world. They do so by trying to please as many as possible without causing harm to the others.But even against this backdrop and considering the fact that this was the last such exercise of an incumbent government, the anticipations before this Budget and the discussions following it were extraordinary.

Apart from the by now routine recourse to off-budget transactions of some expenditures, the revised estimates also appear to have understated likely budgeted expenses on various subsidies which could result in a larger than stated deficit.3 per cent of the GDP to 3. Whether these allocations are adequate to meet the heightened expectations is being questioned, especially in the case of the farm income transfer. That has been the ground of criticism by both political opponents (read Congress) and some economists. Current Budgets revise figures based on such assumptions made in the previous year, in the hope that the new estimates would be justified in light of these revisions. Newspapers carry the Budget, its analysis and commentaries on it days after the event. The "interim Budget" did indeed attempt to do so.4 per cent in the financial year 2018-19.  Governments make budgets to retain and consolidate their hold on power, not to please economists. This was to be expected, since the defeat of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in three central Indian state Assembly elections just months before the nation goes to polls made it more than likely that the government would use the Budget to gain an electoral advantage. But this high moral ground is seldom traversed by Indian governments. It is not universal at all. These decisions of withdrawing subsidies or schemes are extremely difficult in the best of times, and well nigh impossible in periods just before elections.5 and 6 per cent of the GDP. Earlier "interim budgets" have transgressed such limits by claiming that some major decisions cannot wait, as P. With this Budget, the government seems to have walked a very tight rope, of balancing the available (stretched) resources and the need to benefit as large a group as possible. At one time, in the good old licence-permit raj days, there was reason to do so: The aam aadmi and aurat would wait anxiously for which of their daily necessities would be further taxed by the government, or how the few who paid income and other direct taxes would be burdened more. Its live broadcast is followed by prolonged (and repetitive) sessions of the commentariat on the hundreds of news channels, even when the Budget involves not much more than an annual accounting statement that the Constitution enjoins governments of the day to present.

This budget is no exception. Chidambaram did in 2014 when he proposed changes in excise duties and service tax. If one were to go by the calculations of Vijay Joshi of Oxford, who first proposed UBI in the Indian context, or Arvind Subramanian, the former chief economic adviser to the government, who discussed it in the Economic Survey 2016-17, true UBI would غير مجاز مي باشدt between 4. The Piyush Goyal Budget was no exception; it was interim only in the sense that it sought expenditure authorisation for four months, and not the whole financial year. That should please the budget hawks, but niggling doubts China 600D Oxford fabric Factory remain about financial legerdemain governments have routinely used to camouflage reality. And it falls well short the scale of deprivation of the poor as measured by any acceptable yardstick. Mercifully, the extent of this excess is not as yet so great as to cause major worries. Targeting only half the population would shave off another percentage point.. So while we swear by propriety, we do not always observe it. Three sets of issues need to be addressed in this context: Was this indeed an interim Budget (and was the government right in doing what it did); how realistic are the Budget numbers and whether the Budget covers all that needs to be done.

The study conducted at the University of Oxford and published in the Journal of Nature, found that as a result of population growth and the continued consumption of Western diets high in red meats and processed foods, the environmental pressures of the food system could increase by up to 90 percent by 2050, exceeding key planetary boundaries that define a safe operating space for humanity beyond which Earths vital eغير مجاز مي باشدystems could become unstable."

It could lead to dangerous levels of climate change with higher occurrences of extreme weather events, affect the regulatory function of forest eغير مجاز مي باشدystems and biodiversity and pollute water bodies such that it would lead to more oxygen-depleted dead zones in oceans," said author Marco Springmann. But it will also require a shift toward more plant-based diets.Washington: One may be aware that a plant-based diet can make you healthier by lowering the risk of obesity, heart disease, and diabetes..Now, a study suggested that filling your plate with plant foods instead of animal foods can help save the planet.Sustaining a healthier planet will require halving China Bag fabric Factory the amount of food loss and waste, and improving farming practices and technologies.